Forum Romania Inedit
Romania Inedit - Resursa ta de Fun
|
Lista Forumurilor Pe Tematici
|
Forum Romania Inedit | Reguli | Inregistrare | Login
POZE FORUM ROMANIA INEDIT
Nu sunteti logat.
|
Nou pe simpatie:
angela31 la Simpatie.ro
 | Femeie
24 ani
Buzau
cauta Barbat
24 - 60 ani |
|
|
lauvoi
Pe lista neagra
Inregistrat: acum 17 ani
|
|
Andrzej Wajda-Man of Marble (1977)
1458.70 MB | Runtime 2:34:34 | color | Polish with (embeded) English s/t
Audio : mp3 , 48000 Hz , 128 Kb/s , 2-ch
Video : DivX , 1200 Kb/s , 29.97 frm/s , 720x480 (4:3)
(or you may download it as DVD)
DVD | 4369.41 MB | Runtime 2:34:34 | color | Polish with 6 different s/t
Not only is Andrzej Wajda's award winning 'Man of Marble' one of the most important films in the history of Polish cinema, it is also one of the most compelling attacks on government corruption ever made.
It is a 'Citizen Kane' styled story where Wajda introduces us to a young woman in Krakow, Agnieszka, who is making her thesis film. She is looking behind the scenes at the life of a 1950s bricklayer, Birkut, who was briefly elevated to the status of a communist hero. She wants to know how his heroism was created and what became of him. She gets a hold of censored footage and interviews with the man's friends and ex-wife, and the filmmaker who made him a hero.
A portrait of Birkut emerges as a man who believed in the socialist ideals, the workers revolution, and in building housing for all. The young filmmakers hand-driving style and the content of the film however unnerve her superior, who thinks its content is getting too close to a political nerve. The film project is killed with the excuse she is over budget but the young filmmaker pushes forward against all odds to finish her film.
She begins by viewing propaganda film that praises Birkut as a devout worker who slaves away at brick-laying for the officials. He has the appearance of a vigilant, Hercules-like strongman who breezes through the labor without breaking a sweat. Then she goes to interview the director, who was hired by the government. He tells her about the reality of making the film, such as how Birkut was given extra food and water (unlike the other bricklayers). Wajda uses these two conflicting scenes to deconstruct the false imagery that propaganda gives its viewers. He shows us how officials manipulate such situations to their own political good.
Well, basically the catch of the movie is the intertwine of the story with the girl on the way of her desire and the political level which makes this trip also a trip of a historical clearing up. And, in the strange development of we find that the "fake" hero is in fact an authentic one and that we did know the secret of the narrative - the "hero"(the father, the phallus) of the propaganda is the "true" hero, as he had to face real tough moral problems and he lived "the life in truth" . The heroine can develop at last real emotional attachment with the paternal image and she eventually can end her trip by accepting an ally and a friend in the final scene
the film focused on a fictional character's rise and fall in local government. Mateusz Birkut is an ordinary Polish bricklayer working on a massive government project. A film maker decides to stage a propaganda stunt to see if a new record for speed bricklaying could be set. Birkut agrees to give it a try along with his crew. Not only did they meet their goal but they exceeded it--and it was all captured on film to be shown to the masses. Overnight, Birkut becomes a minor celebrity and he is given a nice job working for local government. And, for some reason, over the years his name is just about completely forgotten
Now, over 20 years later, a young film maker has stumbled upon Birkut's name and some of the newsreel footage but she is really curious how he went from hero to nobody so quickly. She spends most of the film reviewing old film clips and tracking down those who knew Birkut to find out WHY. However, repeatedly she is told to mind her own business and lots of roadblocks are thrown in her path.
Finally, after exhaustive work and putting herself out on a limb politically, she finds out how the repressive government worked during the Stalin years--taking a hero and eventually jailing him as a political prisoner and then erasing memories of his existence. Repeatedly, she is warned to let the matter drop, as even in the post-Stalin era it wasn't exactly a free country. How this very critical film ever got made it beyond me but it's wonderfully made and captivating.
or:
(Password-www.AvaxHome.ru)
|
|
| pus acum 16 ani |
|