Forum Romania Inedit
Romania Inedit - Resursa ta de Fun
|
Lista Forumurilor Pe Tematici
|
Forum Romania Inedit | Reguli | Inregistrare | Login
POZE FORUM ROMANIA INEDIT
Nu sunteti logat.
|
Nou pe simpatie:
papiota55 la Simpatie.ro
 | Femeie
22 ani
Bucuresti
cauta Barbat
24 - 54 ani |
|
maverik22
MEMBRU DE BAZA
 Din: Galati
Inregistrat: acum 17 ani
|
|
Delivering you with an idea of what is the worst anti-virus solution for Windows Vista is a tad of an unorthodox approach, I'll give you that much. Generally speaking, the rankings are constructed the other way around, outlining the best solutions to offer you protection. Well, this article will present you with an alternative view. But the term alternative does not invalidate the perspective. Just think about it, you will know what security product to avoid next time you are out shopping for Windows Vista protection.
Well, without further ado... the absolute worst anti-virus for Windows Vista is Microsoft's own Windows Live OneCare. Launched at the end of January 2007, concomitantly with the release of Vista, OneCare has delivered nothing short of a disappointing performance. In the past, it has managed to miss malware samples during the VB100 tests for Vista and to score one of the lowest possible scores in a top compiled by
AV-Comparatives.
Microsoft has taken note of OneCare's failures, but as a newcomer to the security industry, the company can afford to grow. Still, Microsoft has emphasized that OneCare is certified by both the International Computer Security Association (ICSA) Labs and West Coast Labs, two independent certification authorities for security products. But neither ICSA nor WCL certification can do anything to help boost OneCare's performances.
According to AV-Test.org, an independent testing group at the Otto-von-Guericke-University (Magdeburg, Germany), Windows Live OneCare did not come in dead last from a platoon of 29 anti-malware solutions in general, but as far as Windows Vista support is concerned, OneCare is last and least.
"We tested all scanners against a set of malware, including 68,864 backdoors, 47,891 bots (zombies), 407,487 Trojan Horses as well as 82,659 worms, so the total number of malware we tested against was 606,901 files. The best product detected 99.83% of our collection while the worst one was only able to identify 62.12% of the samples. The average product detected 86.95% of the malware files used, with a median of 90.97%. For our testing, we only used current malware -- this means, malware which was not older than 12 months or which have been seen at least once during the last 12 months," revealed AV-Test via SunBelt.
ps: cine spune ca avg e mai slab ca nod, s-a inselat  
Modificat de maverik22 (acum 17 ani)
_______________________________________
x_X
|
|
| pus acum 17 ani |
|
boGGdy
Membru Senior
 Din: Satu' cu sălcii
Inregistrat: acum 18 ani
|
|
Anti-Vir e free si sta bine. Dar... experioenta mea a vazut computere infectate pana-n gura, cu Anti-Vir pe ele. Nu cred ca exista "cel mai bun". Nici antivirus, nici nimic.
_______________________________________
It's nice to be important, but it's more important to be nice!
|
|
| pus acum 17 ani |
|
maverik22
MEMBRU DE BAZA
Din: Galati
Inregistrat: acum 17 ani
|
|
citeste mai bine titlul, e pentru vista nu pentru windows
_______________________________________
x_X
|
|
| pus acum 17 ani |
|
